NCBRC News

by on

Court Lacks Discretion to Allow Ineligible Student Loan Debtor to Proceed in Chapter 13

A debtor who exceeds the debt limit specified in section 109(e) is ineligible for Chapter 13 bankruptcy, regardless of the nature of the debts, and therefore, there is cause for dismissal or conversion. Stearns v. Pratola (In re Pratola), No. 18-213 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 31, 2018).

Christopher Pratola filed a Chapter 13 bankruptcy petition listing unsecured debts at less than the debt limit outlined in section 109(e). He later amended his schedules to include an additional federal student loan debt, which he was repaying under an IBR at 10%. That loan raised his unsecured debt above the debt ceiling. [Read more…] about Court Lacks Discretion to Allow Ineligible Student Loan Debtor to Proceed in Chapter 13

by on

Court’s Sua Sponte Denial of Confirmation Reversed

A bankruptcy court may not deny confirmation of a debtor’s Chapter 13 plan in the absence of objection by the trustee or unsecured creditor, based on its belief that the debtor miscalculated her disposable income. Briggs v. Johns (In re Briggs), No. 17-1080 (W.D. La. Sept. 28, 2018).

In calculating her disposable income, Chapter 13 debtor, Marlea Briggs, deducted $913.00 as mortgage or rental expenses based on the IRS Local Standard. Though no one objected to the plan, the bankruptcy court scheduled a hearing and denied confirmation sua sponte. The court required Ms. Briggs to file a new plan calculating her income using her actual mortgage payments of $438.20. The court then confirmed the plan over Ms. Briggs’s objection. She appealed. [Read more…] about Court’s Sua Sponte Denial of Confirmation Reversed

by on

SCOTUS Denies Cert in Creditor’s Arbitration Appeal

The Supreme Court today denied certiorari in a case filed by Credit One Bank seeking to enforce an arbitration clause in a consumer credit card agreement. Credit One Bank, N.A. v. Anderson, No. 17-1652, petition denied, (Oct. 1, 2018).

The case originated in the Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York on the debtor’s motion to reopen his bankruptcy and seek redress for a discharge injunction violation based on Credit One’s post-discharge collection efforts. Faced with Credit One’s motion to compel arbitration, the bankruptcy court found an inherent conflict between arbitration and the goals of the Bankruptcy Code and denied the motion. The district court and the Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed. Anderson v. Credit One Bank, No. 16-2496 (2d Cir. March 7, 2018).

Find copies of NACBA’s amicus brief and the Second Circuit opinion here.

by on

Debtor Wins Battle of the Code Sections: Exemption vs Set-Off

A debtor’s right to an exemption for a tax refund overrides the IRS’s right to set off that refund to pay tax liabilities. United States of Amer. v. Copley, No. 16-207 (E.D. Va. Sept. 10, 2018).

In their Chapter 7 bankruptcy, Matthew and Jolinda Copley listed tax liabilities for the years 2008, 2009, and 2010 as priority claims held by the IRS. They also sought to exempt their 2013 tax refund of $3,208.00. However, the IRS withheld the tax refund as a set-off against a portion of the tax debt. The bankruptcy court ordered the IRS to turn over the refund to the debtors. [Read more…] about Debtor Wins Battle of the Code Sections: Exemption vs Set-Off

by on

Debtors’ Challenge to Private Student Loan Survives Dismissal Motion

A private loan in excess of the cost of attendance is not subject to exception from discharge under Section 523(a)(8)(A)(ii). McDaniel v. Navient Solutions, No. 09-37450, Adv. Proc. No. 17-1274 (Bankr. D. Colo. Sept. 2018).

In their confirmed Chapter 13 plan, Byron and Laura McDaniel treated their student loans, including those held by Navient Solutions, as unsecured Class Four claims to be deferred until after discharge. Upon completion of their plan, the McDaniels obtained discharge, but later moved to reopen. They filed an adversary proceeding seeking a declaration that a particular private loan held by Navient was not excepted from discharge. They also sought a finding that Navient violated the discharge injunction by collecting on that private loan post-discharge. Navient moved to dismiss the adversary proceeding. [Read more…] about Debtors’ Challenge to Private Student Loan Survives Dismissal Motion

by on

No Recovery for Foreclosure Sale of Non-Disclosed Property

The Chapter 13 debtor was judicially estopped from challenging the foreclosure sale of his property as a violation of the automatic stay because he failed to disclose his ownership interest in the property. Fornesa v. Fifth Third Mortgage Co., No. 17-20324 (5th Cir. July 27, 2018). [Read more…] about No Recovery for Foreclosure Sale of Non-Disclosed Property

by on

Fifth Circuit Addresses Valuation of Mobile Home

Delivery and set-up costs are not included in the valuation of a mobile home under Section 506(a). 21st Mortgage Corp. v. Glenn, No. 17-60533 (5th Cir. Aug. 13, 2018).

Kayla Glenn elected to retain her mobile home and pay it off with 5% interest through her Chapter 13 bankruptcy. 21st Mortgage objected to Ms. Glenn’s proposed plan based on her valuation of the property as not including the cost of delivery and set-up. The bankruptcy court confirmed the plan, and the district court affirmed. 21st Mortgage appealed. [Read more…] about Fifth Circuit Addresses Valuation of Mobile Home

by on

Court May Not Deny Exemption Due to Debtor Misconduct

“A bankruptcy court has no authority under federal law to deny a debtor’s claim of exemptions on a ground that is not specified in the bankruptcy code.” Rucker v. Belew (In re Belew), No. 18-6007 (B.A.P. 8th Cir. Sept. 6, 2018).

Johnny Belew sought to amend his schedules to exempt assets he had failed initially to disclose. The trustee objected. The bankruptcy court found that it had no authority to deny a motion to amend exemptions for any reason not specified in the Code and overruled the trustee’s objections. The trustee appealed. [Read more…] about Court May Not Deny Exemption Due to Debtor Misconduct

by on

Court Puts Trustee Fees Under the Microscope

Where the trustee made no distributions and performed only his regular duties as trustee, the court denied his fee application in total. Citing efficiency concerns, the court also reduced the trustee’s attorney fee application by almost half. In re Stroud, 2018 Bankr. LEXIS 2136, No. 15-74063 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. July 19, 2018).

The debtor filed a Chapter 13 plan proposing to maintain her mortgage payments and pay unsecured creditors at 100%. When she missed payments on the plan, she allowed her case to be converted to Chapter 7. Five weeks later, having obtained new counsel, she moved to reconvert to chapter 13 and to continue her 100% plan. The Chapter 7 trustee objected to the motion, but the case was converted nonetheless. The Chapter 7 trustee, as both trustee and member of the law firm representing him, submitted a fee application seeking $1,716.50 in trustee fees and $13,607.09 in attorney fees. The debtor objected. [Read more…] about Court Puts Trustee Fees Under the Microscope

by on

Availability of IBRP Relevant to Student Loan Discharge

The availability of an income-based repayment program is a factor to be considered in the totality-of-circumstances test for student loan discharge under section 523(a)(8). Kemp v. U.S. Dept.  of Ed., No. 17-6032 (B.A.P. 8th Cir. Aug. 24, 2018).

The bankruptcy appellate panel affirmed the bankruptcy court’s denial of discharge of Erin Kemp’s student loans. The bankruptcy court had based its decision, in part, on the availability of an income-based repayment program when determining whether Ms. Kemp could make payments on the loan while maintaining a minimum standard of living. The panel, relying on the Eighth Circuit opinion in Educ. Credit Mgmt. Corp. v. Jesperson (In re Jesperson), 571 F.3d 775 (8th Cir. 2009), found that the existence of a repayment plan offering lower payments than those mandated by the lending agreement, while not dispositive, was a legitimate factor to be considered in the totality-of-circumstances test. Other factors also contributed to the bankruptcy court’s opinion, however, including the facts that Ms. Kemp had a history of successful employment, understated her income and overstated her expenses, was 36 years-old-at the time of her bankruptcy, and could obtain better employment but chose not to to maintain a flexible part-time work schedule. As to her claim that she suffered from anxiety and depression, the court did not doubt her testimony but found insufficient evidence that those issues prevented full employment. [Read more…] about Availability of IBRP Relevant to Student Loan Discharge