Extension of Stay Applies to Creditor Who Was Not Served with Motion

Posted by NCBRC - February 6th, 2023

The bankruptcy court properly exercised its discretion to grant an extension of stay in the debtor’s second chapter 11 case where the case was filed in good faith as to the creditors to be stayed even though one of the creditors to which the stay applied was not served with the motion. FourWs, LLC. V. Miller, No. 21-1273 (E.D. Cal. Jan 30, 2023). Read More

Right to Dismiss Despite Bad Faith or 109(e) Ineligibility

Posted by NCBRC - January 31st, 2023

A chapter 13 debtor’s statutory right to dismiss his bankruptcy is not precluded by bad faith or ineligibility under section 109(e). Powell v. TICO Construction Co. Inc., No. 22-1014 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. Oct. 21, 2022).

TICO Construction, a judgment creditor in the debtor’s chapter 13 case, opposed the debtor’s motion to voluntarily dismiss his bankruptcy under section 1307(b). TICO alleged both that the debtor’s unsecured debts exceeded the debt limit set forth in section 109(e), and that the debtor abused by the bankruptcy process by transferring non-exempt assets to his ex-wife in “sham” divorce proceedings. TICO requested that, instead of granting the debtor’s motion to dismiss, the court should convert the case to chapter 7 or 11. Read More

UpRight Isn’t

Posted by NCBRC - January 26th, 2023

Although the complaint against him alleged violations of the Bankruptcy Code and he was ultimately sanctioned for ethical violations under Virginia Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer with UpRight was given due process in his sanctions hearing where the complaint specified the alleged misconduct and he was afforded the opportunity to prepare and present a defense. U.S. Trustee v. Delafield, No. 21-1632 (4th Cir. Jan. 11, 2023). Read More

Motgagee Sanctioned for Non-Compliance with Rule 3002.1(b)

Posted by NCBRC - January 24th, 2023

The mortgage creditor’s failure to comply with notice requirements of Rule 3002.1(b) when escrow and interest rates changed during bankruptcy, led the court to determine that the debtors were current on their mortgage payments and to sanction the mortgagee. In re Kinderknecht, No. 17-12530 (Bankr. D. Kans. Jan. 18, 2023). Read More

State Law Does Not Create Exemption in Trust

Posted by NCBRC - January 18th, 2023

A state statute protecting a trust from judgment creditors is not an exemption statute for bankruptcy purposes where it was not designated as such and it did not provide unequivocal protection against all forms of collection. In re Morris, No. 21-30468 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Jan. 13, 2023). Read More

Plan Confirmation Does Not Defeat Antimodification Provision

Posted by NCBRC - January 16th, 2023

Although the debtor’s confirmed chapter 13 plan included a provision for release of the mortgage lien upon payment of the lender’s claim, the bankruptcy court erred in releasing the lien when the claim was for arrearages only, there remained outstanding principle at the end of the plan, and the mortgagee challenged release of the lien prior to discharge. Mortgage Corp. of the South v. Bozeman, No.21-10987 (11th Cir. Jan. 10, 2023). Read More

Experian Not Required under FCRA to Know Legal Validity of Debt

Posted by NCBRC - January 11th, 2023

Where it was not clear whether the debtor’s educational loan was included in his discharge, Experian did not violate the FCRA by reporting it as an outstanding debt. Mader v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc., No. 20-3073 (2d Cir. Jan. 4, 2023). Read More

Non-Debtor Spouse Transfers Interest to Debtor Post-Discharge

Posted by NCBRC - January 5th, 2023

The debtor’s adversary complaint stated a claim under sections 522 and 524 against a creditor who pursued state court action to avoid the transfer of community property from the non-debtor spouse to the debtor after the debtor had obtained discharge of the creditor’s claim. Rhodes v. Pecanland Village Shopping Center, LLC., No. 19-31559, Adv. Proc. No. 22-3010 (Bankr. W.D. La. Dec. 14, 2022). Read More

Removal of Trust Contingency Benefits Estate

Posted by NCBRC - January 2nd, 2023

Removal of a contingency in a Trust did not create a new asset such that the resulting increase in value to the debtor/beneficiary would be considered a post-petition asset. In re Wright, No. 19-21544 (Bankr. D. Kans. Dec. 7, 2022).

The Wrights filed for chapter 13 bankruptcy with unsecured debts totaling $14,196.53. They confirmed a three-year plan that provided little to no distribution to unsecured creditors. When they filed for bankruptcy, Ms. Wright and her siblings were the beneficiaries of an irrevocable Trust consisting of 40 acres of real property. The Trust had a contingency that one of Ms. Wright’s siblings, Ronnie True, would receive the Trust income and continue to live on the Trust property for the remainder of his life. Upon Mr. True’s death, the Trustee could then either deed or sell the property for the benefit of the remaining siblings, including Ms. Wright. Read More

IRA Withdrawals Create Regular Income for 109(e) Purposes

Posted by NCBRC - December 30th, 2022

The debtor had “income” for purposes of eligibility to be a chapter 13 debtor where he intended to use regular withdrawals from his IRA to fund his plan. In re Frysinger, No. 20-31202 (Bankr. D. Ore. Dec. 21, 2022).

The debtor created a plan which he proposed to fund through: 1) holdings in bank account consisting of funds he received pre-petition from settlement of a personal injury lawsuit, 2) future sales of property, and 3) IRA withdrawals. The case came before the court on a creditor’s challenge to the debtor’s status as a bankruptcy debtor under section 109(e). Read More