• National Consumer Bankruptcy Rights Center
  • About
  • Blog
  • Tags
  • Briefs
    • By Category
    • By Code Section
  • Events
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Bruce v. Citigroup, Inc., No. 22-1000 (2d Cir.)

    Posted by NCBRC - November 30th, 2022

    Type: Amicus
    Date: November 23, 2022
    Description: Whether bankruptcy court has authority to adjudicate a national class action claim for a violation of the discharge injunction. Debtor is the appellee.
    Result: Pending.

    Bruce 2d Cir NACBA Amicus Nov 2022

  • Sterling v. Southlake Nautilus Health and Racquett Club, Inc. , No. 18-2773 (7th Cir.)

    Posted by NCBRC - February 20th, 2019

    Type: Amicus
    Date: February 6, 2019
    Description: Whether the bankruptcy court erred in ruling that a creditor and its law firm did not violate the discharge injunction when, after the Chapter 7 debtor’s discharge, she was arrested pursuant to a state court bench warrant that had been issued in supplemental collection proceedings against the debtor in state court.
    Result: Pending

    Sterling 7th Cir NACBA Amicus Feb 2019

  • Bankruptcy Court holds Debtor is Entitled to Chapter 13 Discharge even if Co-Debtor is Delinquent on Post-Petition DSO Payments

    Posted by NCBRC - February 15th, 2019

    A bankruptcy court recently reviewed the issue whether a debtor can receive a discharge under § 1328 even if her co-debtor husband is delinquent on a post-petition DSO payment. The court examined the requirements for discharge using the plain language of § 1328(a).

    In this case the debtors, Mr. and Mrs. Hernandez, filed a joint chapter 13 bankruptcy. At filing neither owed a DSO. Approximately two years into their confirmed plan, Mr. Hernandez became liable for a DSO and subsequently fell behind in those payments. Both parties were aware of the DSO and neither reported the delinquency to their attorney nor the trustee.

    After completion of the plan payments, Mrs. Hernandez moved for entry of discharge pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1328(a). The Trustee objected arguing Mrs. Hernandez was unjustly enriched and that failure to amend the plan demonstrates bad faith. No party disputed that all plan payments were made.

    To read more and access the opinion click here.

  • Taggart v. Lorenzen, No. 18-489 (USSCt)

    Posted by NCBRC - November 30th, 2018

    Type: Amicus
    Date: November 15, 2018
    Description: Whether creditor’s unreasonable belief that conduct did not violate discharge injunction precludes finding of contempt.
    Result: Vacated and Remanded, June 3, 2019. On remand, affirmed, No. 16-35402 (9th Cir. Nov. 24, 2020).

    Taggart (USSC) June 2019

    Taggart NACBA amicus Nov 2018

    Taggart 9th Cir Nov 2020

     

  • Richardson v. Priderock Capital Partners, No. 18-1099 (4th Cir.)

    Posted by NCBRC - April 19th, 2018

    Type: Amicus
    Date: March 26, 2018
    Description: Whether postpetition rent due under prepetition residential lease was postpetition debt discharged in pro se Chapter 7 debtor’s case.
    Result: Pending

    Richardson 4th Cir. NACBA Amicus March 2018

  • Anderson v. Credit One Bank, No. 16-2496 (2d Cir.)

    Posted by NCBRC - March 6th, 2017

    Type: Amicus
    Date: February 27, 2017
    Description: Whether a predispute arbitration agreement strip a court of the inherent power of contempt to enforce its own orders.
    Result: Affirmed and remanded, March 7, 2018.

    Anderson 2d Cir Opinion March 2018

    Anderson Amicus Brief Feb 2017

  • Goudelock v. Sixty-01 Assoc. of Apt. Owners, No. 16-35384 (9th Cir.)

    Posted by NCBRC - November 15th, 2016

    Type: Amicus
    Date: October 21, 2016
    Description: Dischargeability of postpetition HOA dues and assessments in chapter 13.
    Result: Reversed and remanded, July 10, 2018.

    Goudelock 9th Cir July 2018

    goudelock-nacba-amicus-9th-cir-oct-2016

  • In re Lopez, No. 02-15774 (9th Cir.)

    Posted by NCBRC - September 3rd, 2011

    Type: Amicus
    Date: August, 2002
    Description: Whether post-discharge property retention agreement is disguised reaffirmation agreement that violates section 524(c) and (d).
    Result: Affirmed. Debtor won. 345 F.3d 701 (9th Cir. 2002)
    In re Lopez, 345 F.3d 701 (9th Cir., 2003)

  • Cardinal Stritch Univ. v. Kuehn, No. 07-3954 (7th Cir.)

    Posted by NCBRC - September 3rd, 2011

    Type: Amicus
    Date: April 1, 2008
    Description: Whether private college can withhold transcripts from debtor whose tuition debt has been discharged in chapter 7.
    Result: Affirmed. Debtor won.
    Kuehn 7th Cir Opinion

    Kuehn NACBA Amicus 7th Cir

  • Bessette v. Avco Financial Services, Inc., No. 99-2291 (1st Cir.)

    Posted by NCBRC - September 1st, 2011

    Type: Amicus
    Date: February 14, 2000
    Description: Enforceability of discharge injunction in class action.
    Result: Reversed. 230 F.3d 439 (1st Cir. 2000)

    Bessette 1st Cir NACBA amicus
    Opinion 

  • Search

  • Request Assistance

    Request assistance with a case.

     

  • Help NCBRC

    NCBRC needs your support to protect the rights of consumer bankruptcy debtors. The most effective way to support NCBRC is with a direct donation.

     

     

    There are many other ways to give to NRBRC:

     

    iGive.com: When you purchase items at over 1,400 online stores, a percentage of your purchase will be donated to NCBRC. Stores include Macy’s, Melissa and Doug, Bed Bath & Beyond, Nike, Petsmart, and more. Shop and Give today!

    More ways to help

  • HAVEN Act Guide

    HAVEN Act Guide 2019

     The Honoring American Veterans in Extreme Need Act of 2019 (“HAVEN Act”) excludes certain benefits paid to veterans or their family members from the definition of current monthly income (“CMI”) found in the Bankruptcy Code. The HAVEN Act amends § 101(10A) of the Bankruptcy Code and supplements the 2005 amendments to the Code that excluded other government benefits, such as social security income. 

    This Guide provides an overview of the HAVEN Act identifies benefits that are excluded, and answers frequently asked questions.

     

  • Keep up with NCBRC

    Cases In Review January 2021

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • RSS
  • Thank you!

    Thank you to the following organizations without whose support our work would not be possible.

     

    American College of Bankruptcy
    The American College of Bankruptcy is an honorary public service association of bankruptcy and insolvency professionals who are invited to join as Fellows based on a proven record of the highest standards of professionalism plus service to the profession and their communities.  Together with its affiliated Foundation, the College is the largest financial supporter of bankruptcy and insolvency-related pro bono legal service programs in the United States.

     

    NACBA
    The only national organization dedicated to serving the needs of consumer bankruptcy attorneys and protecting the rights of consumer debtors in bankruptcy. Formed in 1992, NACBA has more than 3,000 members located in all 50 states and Puerto Rico.

     

    O. Max Gardner Foundation, Inc.
    The O. Max Gardner Foundation, Inc. provides financial support to institutions devoted to charitable, scientific, literary or educational purposes.  NCBRC has been a recipient of grant awards from the foundation.

    Visit NACBA.org
© 2011 National Consumer Bankruptcy Rights Center