Type: Amicus
Date: January 29, 2021
Description: What is the proper test for determining undue hardship for the discharge of student loans.
Result: Petition denied, June 21, 2021.
Posted by NCBRC - February 18th, 2021
Type: Amicus
Date: January 29, 2021
Description: What is the proper test for determining undue hardship for the discharge of student loans.
Result: Petition denied, June 21, 2021.
Posted by NCBRC - December 6th, 2019
Type: Amicus
Date: December 3, 2019
Description: Whether court misapplied the Brunner elements when addressing undue hardship in student loan case, and whether Brunner is outdated.
Result: Pending
Posted by NCBRC - May 1st, 2019
Type: Amicus
Date: April 18, 2019
Description: Whether the bankruptcy court erred in ruling that the expression “an obligation to repay funds received as an educational benefit, scholarship or stipend” in 523(a)(8)(A)(ii) does not include a loan, so that the Chapter 13 debtors’ $107,467 debt for six Sallie Mae “Tuition Answer Loans” was discharged.
Result: Pending
McDaniel 10th Cir Amicus April 2019
Posted by NCBRC - February 20th, 2019
Type: Amicus
Date: January 29, 2019
Description: Whether the bankruptcy court erred in granting the debtor a partial discharge of her student loan debt, discharging all but the original principal balance of the loans.
Result: Judgment affirmed, May 2, 2019.
Posted by NCBRC - November 13th, 2018
Type: Amicus
Date: November 5, 2018
Description: Whether the Brunner undue hardship test as applied in the Fifth Circuit is contrary to the language of the Code, and whether the Brunner test is obsolete in general.
Result: pending
Posted by NCBRC - April 28th, 2017
Type: Amicus
Date: April 27, 2017
Description: Whether, in student loan discharge case, income driven repayment plans are relevant to the issue of undue hardship.
Result: Affirmed, September 22, 2017. Debtor won.
Posted by NCBRC - August 31st, 2016
Type: Amicus
Date: August 22, 2016
Description: Whether the debtor was entitled to hardship discharge of her student loans.
Result: Reversed and remanded, April 19, 2017.
Posted by NCBRC - July 31st, 2015
Type: Amicus
Date: July 29, 2015
Description: Whether Brunner test for undue hardship is too severe and is obsolete.
Result: Voluntarily dismissed June 16,2016.
 
NCBRC needs your support to protect the rights of consumer bankruptcy debtors. The most effective way to support NCBRC is with a direct donation.
There are many other ways to give to NRBRC:
iGive.com: When you purchase items at over 1,400 online stores, a percentage of your purchase will be donated to NCBRC. Stores include Macy’s, Melissa and Doug, Bed Bath & Beyond, Nike, Petsmart, and more. Shop and Give today!
Thank you to the following organizations without whose support our work would not be possible.
American College of Bankruptcy
The American College of Bankruptcy is an honorary public service association of bankruptcy and insolvency professionals who are invited to join as Fellows based on a proven record of the highest standards of professionalism plus service to the profession and their communities. Together with its affiliated Foundation, the College is the largest financial supporter of bankruptcy and insolvency-related pro bono legal service programs in the United States.
NACBA
The only national organization dedicated to serving the needs of consumer bankruptcy attorneys and protecting the rights of consumer debtors in bankruptcy. Formed in 1992, NACBA has more than 3,000 members located in all 50 states and Puerto Rico.