• National Consumer Bankruptcy Rights Center
  • About
  • Blog
  • Tags
  • Briefs
    • By Category
    • By Code Section
  • Events
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • McCoy v. U.S.A., No. 20-886 (S.Ct.)

    Posted by NCBRC - February 18th, 2021

    Type: Amicus
    Date: January 29, 2021
    Description: What is the proper test for determining undue hardship for the discharge of student loans.
    Result: Petition denied, June 21, 2021.

    McCoy Amicus SCt Jan 2021

  • Munch v. Educ. Credit Mgmt Corp., No. 18-56300 (9th Cir.)

    Posted by NCBRC - December 6th, 2019

    Type: Amicus
    Date: December 3, 2019
    Description: Whether court misapplied the Brunner elements when addressing undue hardship in student loan case, and whether Brunner is outdated.
    Result: Pending

    Munch amicus final 2019

  • Navient Solutions, LLC v. McDaniel, No. 18-1445 (10th Cir.)

    Posted by NCBRC - May 1st, 2019

    Type: Amicus
    Date: April 18, 2019
    Description: Whether the bankruptcy court erred in ruling that the expression “an obligation to repay funds received as an educational benefit, scholarship or stipend” in 523(a)(8)(A)(ii) does not include a loan, so that the Chapter 13 debtors’ $107,467 debt for six Sallie Mae “Tuition Answer Loans” was discharged.
    Result: Pending

    McDaniel 10th Cir Amicus April 2019

     

  • Educ. Credit Management Corp. v. Metz, No. 18-1281 (D. Kans)

    Posted by NCBRC - February 20th, 2019

    Type: Amicus
    Date: January 29, 2019
    Description: Whether the bankruptcy court erred in granting the debtor a partial discharge of her student loan debt, discharging all but the original principal balance of the loans.
    Result: Judgment affirmed, May 2, 2019.

    Metz D Kans May 2019

    Metz D Kans NACBA Amicus Jan 2019

  • Thomas v. Department of Educ., No. 18-11091 (5th Cir.)

    Posted by NCBRC - November 13th, 2018

    Type: Amicus
    Date: November 5, 2018
    Description: Whether the Brunner undue hardship test as applied in the Fifth Circuit is contrary to the language of the Code, and whether the Brunner test is obsolete in general.
    Result: pending

    Thomas 5th Cir NACBA amicus Nov 2018

  • ECMC v. Murray, No. 16-2838 (D. Kans.)

    Posted by NCBRC - April 28th, 2017

    Type: Amicus
    Date: April 27, 2017
    Description: Whether, in student loan discharge case, income driven repayment plans are relevant to the issue of undue hardship.
    Result: Affirmed, September 22, 2017. Debtor won.

    Murray D Kans Opinion Sept 2017

    Murray NACBA amicus April 2017

  • Acosta Conniff v. ECMC, No. 16-12884 (11th Cir.)

    Posted by NCBRC - August 31st, 2016

    Type: Amicus
    Date: August 22, 2016
    Description: Whether the debtor was entitled to hardship discharge of her student loans.
    Result: Reversed and remanded, April 19, 2017.

    Acosta-Conniff 11th Cir. opinion April 2017

    Acosta Conniff NACBA brief 11th Cir Aug 2016

  • Murphy v. U.S. Dept. of Educ., No. 14-1691 (1st Cir.)

    Posted by NCBRC - July 31st, 2015

    Type: Amicus
    Date: July 29, 2015
    Description: Whether Brunner test for undue hardship is too severe and is obsolete.
    Result: Voluntarily dismissed June 16,2016.

    Murphy 1st Cir Amicus

  • Search

  • Request Assistance

    Request assistance with a case.

     

  • Help NCBRC

    NCBRC needs your support to protect the rights of consumer bankruptcy debtors. The most effective way to support NCBRC is with a direct donation.

     

     

    There are many other ways to give to NRBRC:

     

    iGive.com: When you purchase items at over 1,400 online stores, a percentage of your purchase will be donated to NCBRC. Stores include Macy’s, Melissa and Doug, Bed Bath & Beyond, Nike, Petsmart, and more. Shop and Give today!

    More ways to help

  • HAVEN Act Guide

    HAVEN Act Guide 2019

     The Honoring American Veterans in Extreme Need Act of 2019 (“HAVEN Act”) excludes certain benefits paid to veterans or their family members from the definition of current monthly income (“CMI”) found in the Bankruptcy Code. The HAVEN Act amends § 101(10A) of the Bankruptcy Code and supplements the 2005 amendments to the Code that excluded other government benefits, such as social security income. 

    This Guide provides an overview of the HAVEN Act identifies benefits that are excluded, and answers frequently asked questions.

     

  • Keep up with NCBRC

    Cases In Review January 2021

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • RSS
  • Thank you!

    Thank you to the following organizations without whose support our work would not be possible.

     

    American College of Bankruptcy
    The American College of Bankruptcy is an honorary public service association of bankruptcy and insolvency professionals who are invited to join as Fellows based on a proven record of the highest standards of professionalism plus service to the profession and their communities.  Together with its affiliated Foundation, the College is the largest financial supporter of bankruptcy and insolvency-related pro bono legal service programs in the United States.

     

    NACBA
    The only national organization dedicated to serving the needs of consumer bankruptcy attorneys and protecting the rights of consumer debtors in bankruptcy. Formed in 1992, NACBA has more than 3,000 members located in all 50 states and Puerto Rico.

     

    O. Max Gardner Foundation, Inc.
    The O. Max Gardner Foundation, Inc. provides financial support to institutions devoted to charitable, scientific, literary or educational purposes.  NCBRC has been a recipient of grant awards from the foundation.

    Visit NACBA.org
© 2011 National Consumer Bankruptcy Rights Center