Type: Amicus
Date: June 14, 2007
Description: Forward looking vs Mechanical approach to projected disposable income and applicable commitment period.
Result: Affirmed. Debtor won.
Kagenveama 9th Cir opinion
In re Frederickson, No. 07-3391 (8th Cir.)
Type: Amicus
Date: January 8, 2008
Description: Whether applicable commitment period is multiplier or temporal requirement and whether disposable income is projected using schedules I and J.
Result: Reversed. Supreme Court petition denied March 23, 2009.
Frederickson 8th Cir opinion