• National Consumer Bankruptcy Rights Center
  • About
  • Blog
  • Tags
  • Briefs
    • By Category
    • By Code Section
  • Caselaw Updates
  • Events
  • Resources
  • Contact

  • 10th Circuit BAP Says Amending Schedules in a Reopened Case is not Subject to Excusable Neglect Test

    Posted by NCBRC - February 6th, 2019

    The Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the 10th Circuit recently addressed a thorny issue about amending schedules in reopened cases. See In re Dollman, BAP No. NM-18-030(10th Cir. B.A.P. February 5, 2019). The question is whether a debtor in a reopened case seeking to amend schedules must first move for an extension of time pursuant to Fed.R.Bankr.P. 9006, and demonstrate excusable neglect.

    In Dollman and the consolidated companion case In re Mendoza, both debtors unknowingly failed to disclose personal injury claims in their schedules. Both cases received a chapter 7 discharge. Both debtors reopened their cases to amend their schedules and claim exemptions in the settlements. In both cases the chapter 7 trustee objected to the amended schedules asserting that the debtors must show excusable neglect under Fed.R.Bankr.P. 9006(b) before they could exercise their rights to amend under Fed.R.Bankr.P. 1009(a). The bankruptcy courts sustained those objections on the basis that neither of them could show excusable neglect for failing to amend schedules prior to the closing of their cases.

    Read More

  • Ingram v, AAA Cooper Transportation, No. 16-11440 (11th Cir.)

    Posted by NCBRC - June 21st, 2016

    Type: Amicus
    Date: June 16, 2016
    Description: Whether Chapter 13 debtors have a free-standing duty to amend their bankruptcy schedules to reflect the post-petition acquisition of a legal claim. Whether judicial estoppel is appropriately applied against former Chapter 13 debtors who attempt to amend their bankruptcy schedules.
    Results: Pending

    Ingram NACBA Amicus 11th Cir June 2016

  • Jones v. Bob Evans Farms, Inc., No. 15-2058 (8th Cir.)

    Posted by NCBRC - August 11th, 2015

    Type: Amicus
    Date: August 10, 2015
    Description: Whether under Rule 1007(h) a chapter 13 debtor has a duty to disclose acquisition of post-petition legal claim.
    Result: Affirmed, January 26, 2016. Debtor lost.

    Jones 8th Cir opinion

    Jones NACBA amicus 8th Cir.

  • Search

  • Request Assistance

    Request assistance with a case.

     

  • Help NCBRC

    NCBRC needs your support to protect the rights of consumer bankruptcy debtors. The most effective way to support NCBRC is with a direct donation.

     

     

    There are many other ways to give to NRBRC:

     

    iGive.com: When you purchase items at over 1,400 online stores, a percentage of your purchase will be donated to NCBRC. Stores include Macy’s, Melissa and Doug, Bed Bath & Beyond, Nike, Petsmart, and more. Shop and Give today!

    More ways to help

  • HAVEN Act Guide

    HAVEN Act Guide 2019

     The Honoring American Veterans in Extreme Need Act of 2019 (“HAVEN Act”) excludes certain benefits paid to veterans or their family members from the definition of current monthly income (“CMI”) found in the Bankruptcy Code. The HAVEN Act amends § 101(10A) of the Bankruptcy Code and supplements the 2005 amendments to the Code that excluded other government benefits, such as social security income. 

    This Guide provides an overview of the HAVEN Act identifies benefits that are excluded, and answers frequently asked questions.

     

  • Keep up with NCBRC

    Cases In Review January 2021

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • RSS

  • Thank you!

    Thank you to the following organizations without whose support our work would not be possible.

     

    American College of Bankruptcy
    The American College of Bankruptcy is an honorary public service association of bankruptcy and insolvency professionals who are invited to join as Fellows based on a proven record of the highest standards of professionalism plus service to the profession and their communities.  Together with its affiliated Foundation, the College is the largest financial supporter of bankruptcy and insolvency-related pro bono legal service programs in the United States.

     

    NACBA
    The only national organization dedicated to serving the needs of consumer bankruptcy attorneys and protecting the rights of consumer debtors in bankruptcy. Formed in 1992, NACBA has more than 3,000 members located in all 50 states and Puerto Rico.

     

    O. Max Gardner Foundation, Inc.
    The O. Max Gardner Foundation, Inc. provides financial support to institutions devoted to charitable, scientific, literary or educational purposes.  NCBRC has been a recipient of grant awards from the foundation.

    Visit NACBA.org
© 2011 National Consumer Bankruptcy Rights Center